Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On 1/26/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think what he's suggesting is deliberately not updating the hint bits
> > during a SELECT ...
> 
> 
> No, I was suggesting doing it in bgwriter so that we may not need to that
> during
> a SELECT. Of course, we need to investigate more and have numbers to prove
> the need. Also you have already expressed concerns that doing so in bgwriter
> is deadlock
> prone. So there is certainly more work needed for any such scheme to work.

Added to TODO:

        * Consider having the background writer update the transaction status
          hint bits before writing out the page

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

                http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Reply via email to