Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I still tthink it's a good idea. Even though it doesn't solve every > case, it solves a lot of them I think. And more importantly on that, I > don't see how it would *break* anything (given that it still fires only > when running as a service, when everything on stderr is just thrown away > anyway). Do you see suhc a failure case?
The case I'm worried about is subprocess startup, where we haven't yet been able to re-set any of these variables correctly. And yes, I think it's an issue: if a DBA is expecting to find PG error messages in the syslogger files, he's unlikely to go look in the eventlog. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq