Has anyone looked into $SUBJECT? I just today realized that the ECPG-Check failures on that machine are not the run-of-the-mill small difference in the expected results. Rather, most of the tests are actually dumping core on the client side:
testing connect/test1.pgc ... skipped testing connect/test2.pgc ... Segmentation Fault - core dumped FAILED (log) testing connect/test3.pgc ... Segmentation Fault - core dumped FAILED (log) testing connect/test4.pgc ... ok testing connect/test5.pgc ... ok testing compat_informix/charfuncs.pgc ... ok testing compat_informix/dec_test.pgc ... ok testing compat_informix/rfmtdate.pgc ... ok testing compat_informix/rfmtlong.pgc ... ok testing compat_informix/rnull.pgc ... Segmentation Fault - core dumped FAILED (log, output) testing compat_informix/test_informix.pgc ... Segmentation Fault - core dumped FAILED (log, output) testing compat_informix/test_informix2.pgc ... Segmentation Fault - core dumped FAILED (log, output) testing preproc/comment.pgc ... ok testing preproc/define.pgc ... Segmentation Fault - core dumped FAILED (log, output) etc etc BTW, this is a perfect example of why it's not a good idea to allow minor regression failures to go unfixed --- people become desensitized. I know I've been completely ignoring ECPG-Check buildfarm results for awhile now. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend