On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:36:56 +0100 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > I'm not concerned so much about the runtime as the development and > > maintenance effort... > > Shouldn't we at least add the one or two exemplary statements that > failed so we have some sort of coverage of the problem?
How about a rule that says no new ode without a test? That's one of the ways that extreme programming is applied to new projects. Basically what that means is that bugs continue to be found but we never see the same bug twice because the regression test catches those. Of course, while you are creating one test you can always add a few related ones. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
