Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about adding a new 2-byte field to header for in-page c_tid poiner > for HOT ?
We just finished sweating blood to get the tuple header size down to 23 bytes from 27 (which saves 8 bytes not 4 if MAXALIGN=8). We are not going to blow that again on HOT. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend