On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:27:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Our docs for the integer datetime option says: > > Note also that the integer datetimes > > code is newer than the floating-point code, and we still find bugs in it > > from time to time. > > > Is the last sentence about bugs really true anymore? At least the buildfarm > > seems to have a lot *more* machines with it enabled than without. > > Buildfarm proves only that the regression tests don't expose any bugs, > not that there aren't any. > > > (I'm thinking about making it the defautl for the vc++ build, which is > > why I came across that) > > FWIW, there are several Linux distros that build their RPMs that way, > so it's not like people aren't using it. But it seems like we find bugs > in the datetime/interval stuff all the time, as people trip over > different weird edge cases.
Certainly, but is it more likely to trip on these in the integer datetime case, really? //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq