Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 13:12 schrieb Alvaro Herrera: > >> I don't understand -- what problem you got with "NO OPERATION"? It > >> seemed a sound idea to me. > > > It seems nonorthogonal. What if only some of the tables you mentioned did > > not > > exist? Do you get "SOME OPERATION"? > > I'd say you get DROP TABLE as long as at least one table was dropped.
If we went with DROP TABLE if any table was dropped, and NO OPERATION for none, I am fine with that. What I didn't want was a different NO OPERATION-type of message for every object type. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
