Florian G. Pflug wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >No you're right, it's related to the WAL undo stuff that was never > >actually implemented. It's dead code. > > > >Teodor Sigaev wrote: > >>Opps, sorry, I missed checkpoint keyword > >> > >>Teodor Sigaev wrote: > >>> > >>>>What am I missing? > >>>Seems, it's about that > >>>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-06/msg00085.php > > Thanks - everything makes much more sense now ;-)
So if you want to submit a patch to remove it, it'll make sense for future readers as well ;-) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
