On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:27:38PM -0500 I heard the voice of Andrew Dunstan, and lo! it spake thus: > > This decision really belongs to the handful of people who do most of > the maintenance and live with most of any CVS pain that exists: such > as Tom, Bruce, Peter, Neil, Alvaro. Othe people have a right to > voice an opinion, but nobody should be pushing on it.
One thing that the DVCS crowd pushes is that that's _not_ the whole story. With CVS (or other centralized systems), the VCS is a development tool for the few core people, and a glorified FTP/snapshotting system for everyone else. With a DVCS, _everybody_ gets a development tool out of it. ObBias: After much resistance, I drank the distributed Kool-Aid. My poison of choice is bzr, which is very probably not ready performance-wise for Pg. So, I also look forward to a switch happening not now, but in a year or two, when the performance failings are historical and bzr can be chosen 8-} -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
