On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 16:20 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Thus we may literally not have rights to the code. Do you really want to > go down the path of in 2 years, Fujitsu (No offense Fujitsu), but you > are the topic) decides that the code they provided is owned by them and > they didn't give us permission?
For the case in question, sure, requiring some clarification from FJ would be reasonable. But more broadly, my point is that I think you're fooling yourself if you think that requiring a disclaimer or explicit transfer of copyright for this *one* particular patch is likely to make any material difference to the overall copyright status of the code base. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
