Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:14:24PM +0000, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
cache instead. In the index scan phase, it's randomly accessed, but if
the table is clustered, it's in fact not completely random access. In
the 2nd vacuum pass, the array is scanned sequentially again. I'm not
Only if there's only one index on the table... otherwise I'd argue that
you're much less likely to be searching the TID list incrementally.
Yeah, sure.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
