Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> +1 (again) Although I would see something like this: >> CREATE INDEX fti1 on t1(c1) USING FULLTEXT [WITH] GIST | GIN > > Surely the CREATE INDEX syntax has got enough warts on it already. > Can't we express this as a particular operator class, or something > that doesn't add any new syntax?
Do you mean something like: CREATE INDEX fti1 ON t1 USING GIST|GIN(c1) WITH (FULLTEXT) The above I got from the idea of FILLFACTOR so you could have something like WITH (FILLFACTOR = 70, FULLTEXT) (not even sure if that is relevant) OR CREATE INDEX ftil ON t1 USING GIST|GIN(C1 FULLTEXT); Where FULLTEXT is like VARCHAR OPS? I could live with that. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend