Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> missing BYTE_ORDER definition for Solaris | >> 2007-01-10 14:18:23 | 1
> What is this BYTE_ORDER macro? Should I be using it instead of the > AC_C_BIGENDIAN test in configure for the packed varlena patch? Actually, if we start to rely on AC_C_BIGENDIAN, I'd prefer to see us get rid of direct usages of BYTE_ORDER. It looks like only contrib/pgcrypto is depending on it today, but we've got lots of cruft in the include/port/ files supporting that. >> row-ordering discrepancy in rowtypes test | >> 2007-02-10 03:00:02 | 3 > Is this because the test is fixed or unfixable? It's fixed. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-02/msg00228.php regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
