Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Huxton wrote: >> Is this not what we do with aggregate functions at present?
> Yes, more or less. That's what made me think of it. > OTOH, before we rush out and do it someone needs to show that it's a net > win. Yeah, because this isn't doing anything to address the problem of entry/exit overhead from calling a PL function many times. I kinda dislike shoving the problem onto the heads of PL programmers anyway... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend