Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm confused. If this is exactly the same as EUC_JP, why do we need >> any new code at all?
> I said *encoding schema" is same, not the contents (character set) is > same. In another word, characters included in EUC_JP are not same as > EUC_JIS_2004. I'm still confused. If the set of characters is different, then surely we need at least a different UTF8<->EUC_JIS_2004 conversion function? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate