> ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Backend encodings must have the property > >> that all bytes of a multibyte character are >= 128. > > > But then, PG_JOHAB have already infringed it. Please see johab_to_utf8.map. > > Trailing bytes of JOHAB can be less than 128. > > In that case we must remove JOHAB from the list of allowed server > encodings. Tatsuo, can you comment on whether this is correct?
Sigh. From the first day when JOHAB was supported (back to 7.3 days), it should had not been in the server encodings. JOHAB's second byte definitely contain 0x41 and above. *johab*.map just reflect the fact. I think we should remove JOHAB from the server encodings list. I'm afraid users who have JOHAB encoded databases get angry, though. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
