David Fetter wrote: > The first is in type_sanity, which basically doesn't understand that > complex types now have array types associated with them and thinks > they're orphan array types, so it's actually the test that's not > right.
Hmm, I question the usefulness of automatically creating array types for all relation types that are created -- the catalog bloat seems a bit too much. An array of pg_autovacuum for example, does that make sense? I'm not sure what was the reaction to having an "CREATE TYPE foo ARRAY OF bar" command of some kind? I think this was discussed but not explicitely rejected, or was it? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
