Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I just realized that I need to check every usage of typtype to be >>> sure that the enums patch is sane. So, barring objection, I intend >>> to take this opportunity to make the code stop referring directly >>> to 'b', 'c' etc whereever possible. Any objections to these names?
> Why not enums? ;-) Well, macros is how we do it elsewhere for "char" system columns. I'm not sure we could rely on the behavior if we declared pg_type.typtype as an enum type ... and if we don't, there's not much point. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org