Tom, On 4/3/07 7:15 AM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, it strikes me that a GUC variable is quite the wrong way to go > about this. The right way is a table storage parameter, a la FILLFACTOR, > so that it can be set on a per-table basis. That would also give us a > chance to fix my concern about needs_toast_table: the case where we > might need a toast table that we didn't need before is where the toast > threshold is lowered via ALTER TABLE SET, and we could reasonably make > that command recheck the situation. This also seems to also support further development along the vertical partitioning path. Any thought on support of per-column TOAST tables? - Luke ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly