Hi Bruce, On 4/12/07 9:24 AM, "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luke Lonergan wrote: >> Hi Bruce, >> >> How about these: >> >> - Allow specification of TOAST size threshold in bytes on a per column basis >> - Enable storage of columns in separate TOAST tables >> - Enable use of multi-row compression method(s) for TOAST tables > > At this point I would be happy just to set the TOAST threshold to a > value defined as optimal, rather than as the most minimal use of TOAST > possible. I agree that's a good starting point, I guess I was thinking that was already included in the work that Tom has been doing. If not, we can add a TODO like this as a precursor to the ones above: - Allow specification of TOAST size threshold (in bytes) on a per table basis - Luke ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
