Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I whipped up a quick patch to use names as well as OIDs for the
> identifiers in the message, but on reflection the simple approach to
> doing this is problematic: when we do syscache lookups to lookup the
> identifier names, we might need to acquire an AccessShareLock on various
> system catalogs (pg_class, pg_namespace, pg_database). This could fail
> (e.g. because of a deadlock involving a system catalog), causing the
> deadlock detector to infinitely recurse (albeit slowly).
Yup, that's exactly why it doesn't do that already.
> We could fix this by first conditionally acquiring AccessShareLocks on
> the necessary system catalogs.
I don't think you've thought of quite all of the failure cases. One
that's a bit pressing is that a deadlock isn't necessarily confined to
objects in your own database.
My take on this is that I'd much rather have unfriendly information
than none at all.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
