On May 1, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
On May 1, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I would call them "gss" and "gss-sec". Or possibly "gss-enc". I
think
that's a lot more clear than "gss-np" (something ending with -
sec is a
giveaway)
+1
If we settle on gss-np and gss-sec is that a good compromise?
I still think the "-np" part is unclear - it's not "easily guessable
without reading the documentation", unless you're already familiar
with it.
//Magnus
gss-noprot and gss-prot
gss-noenc and gss-enc
??
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
