Marc Munro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2007-02-05 at 08:27 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> The question was rhetorical ... there is no list of "certified sane but >> unapplied" patches. You are proceeding on the basis of a faulty >> understanding of how our processes work.
> Why do we need to know the patch is sane? If it does not apply cleanly > or causes regression tests to fail, the process would figure that out > quickly and cheaply. There is little cost in attempting to apply a > non-sane patch. Unless it contains a trojan horse. I don't think many buildfarm owners are running the tests inside a sandbox so tight that they don't care how nasty the code that runs there might be. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org