> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 05/05/07, 11:06:37
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
>
> > <snip tracker outline>
> >
> > Barring a few trivial details, that sounds almost identical to what I
> > proposed.
>
> Well, Andrew says everyone he talks to doesn't want it. They want a
> more comprehensive solution that goes from bug to patch.
>
I don't recall him saying that, though I do know that's /his/ opinion. It's
certainly *not* the opinion of most of the people I've spoken with.
I don't disagree with the idea in principle though, but I don't believe it will
work for us because it's so fundamentally different from the way we currently
work and still wouldn't solve the problem of capturing all the relevant
discussion regarding a given patch (or bug) without a reasonable amount of
manual work, or grafting a large part of what I'm proposing on the side.
Regards, Dave
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
