Aidan Van Dyk wrote: > * Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070516 07:23]: > > > Maybe. However I think "subject-sequence" has some advantages over > > Message-Id: > > > > - Easy to identify. Message-Id may not appear on some MUA with default > > setting > > > > - More handy than lengthy message Id > > > > - Easy to detect messages not delivered, by knowing that the sequence > > number was skipped > > IMNSHO, we should be encouraging lists to move *away* from subject > munging. Adding more characters into a subject line which can already > be quite long is just making the situation worse.
+1 on that. It gets worse when messages are crossposted to multiple lists and so multiple [FOO] strings are put into the subject. On the other hand I know there is people who remove the [FOO] strings in their local machines! (I don't do it just because I have been too lazy to write a procmail rule about it). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
