Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> This is even better than our archives due to the problem that the >>> archives don't have links to messages crossing month boundaries. Have >>> you noticed that if you go to the archives, some discussions appear >>> truncated at a point, but you can go to the archive for the next month >>> and it continues there? I find that artifact somewhat annoying. The >>> bug report would continue receiving the CC'ed mails, so it would record >>> them all in a single place. > >> Not crossing month boundaries is super-annoying. > > Indeed, but that should be fixed. I can't imagine that one > presumably-fixable deficiency is grounds for changing our entire > discussion infrastructure. Or do you think we will find something > else that has no deficiencies of its own?
Very much agreed, however, changing how it's done might open up ways to change other things for the better - things we can't do now. But getting rid of that annoying thing alone does not change anything else, or require changing of anything else. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate