Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 04:52:16PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
This is what happens with the Linux kernel. They have hundreds of
developers getting their hands dirty during a previous period. Then
2.6.20 is released; the 2.6.21 "merge window" opens, and all sort of
patches are flooded in.
I hasten to point out that the Linux kernel has also had several
"stable" releases with huge bugs --
/me fondly remembers kernel 2.4.
things like massive filesystem
corruption, bizarre failure cases, and nasty compatibility problems
with modules across versions. I am not entirely sure that the Linux
model is the one to ape. PostgreSQL has a history with remarkably
few of those blunders, and I'd hate to give that up.
A
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
