Added to TODO: * Fix self-referential UPDATEs seeing inconsistent row versions in read-committed mode
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00507.php --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard Huxton wrote: > Florian G. Pflug wrote: > > > > Is there consensus what the correct behaviour should be for > > self-referential updates in read-committed mode? Does the SQL Spec > > have anything to say about this? > > This seems to have gone all quiet. Do we need a TODO to keep a note of > it? Just "correct behaviour for self-referential updates" > > Hiroshi originally noted the problem in one of his views here: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00507.php > > -- > Richard Huxton > Archonet Ltd > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
