Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thinking more, it striked me that users can define arbitarily growing
> rate by using CFREATE CONVERSION. So it seems we need functionality to
> define the growing rate anyway.
Seems to me that would be an argument for moving the palloc inside the
conversion functions, as I suggested before.
In practice though, I find it hard to imagine a pair of encodings for
which the growth rate is more than 3x. You'd need something that
translates a single-byte character into 4 or more bytes (pretty
unlikely, especially considering we require all these encodings to be
ASCII supersets); or something that translates a 2-byte character into
more than 6 bytes.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
