Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gurjeet Singh wrote: >> But I did not understand the haste to commit the patch within almost half an >> hour of proposing the second version of the patch!!!
> It happens some times when a patch applier has gotten as far as they can > go with a patch and wants to move on, with the willingness to return to > the patch if there is any additional feedback. Er, it was quite a bit more than half an hour; about 17 hours in fact: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-05/msg00421.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-05/msg00315.php In any case this patch was just a working-out of ideas I'd proposed more than a month previously, so I didn't expect it to be controversial. But as Bruce says, nothing is set in stone at this point. If you have suggestions for improvements, we can tweak the hooks pretty much any time up till 8.3 final. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
