Brian Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I just finished giving someone the standard advice to wait a bit before
>> trying to drop a database that'd just been accessed:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-05/msg01505.php
> Is this a synchronization issue?
The problem is that the user thinks his previous disconnect is finished
when it may not be --- it's entirely possible in fact that his old
backend hasn't even received the disconnect message yet. So I don't
think it's possible to rely on there being a state change inside the
database indicating that the other guy is about to exit.
Even if we had a semaphore of the sort you suggest, I doubt people would
want DROP DATABASE to wait indefinitely. The real question here is how
long is it reasonable for DROP DATABASE to wait before failing ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
