Magnus Hagander wrote: > I think that's backwards. We *are* passing them by reference, we should > be considering passing them by value.
Thanks, fixed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > //Magnus > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Added to TODO: > > > > * Consider allowing 64-bit integers to be passed by reference on 64-bit > > platforms > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Neil Conway wrote: > >> On Tue, 2007-29-05 at 16:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> (I imagine someday we'll get around to allowing int8 to be pass-by-value > >>> on 64-bit platforms.) > >> This could really be a significant performance win: I'm planning to take > >> a look at doing it for 8.4. > >> > >> -Neil > >> > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > >> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > >> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > >> match > > -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
