"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The best idea I can come up with for the back branches is > to make ExecHashGetBucketAndBatch do hash_any internally, say
hashany of a 4-byte value degenerates to pretty much just a call to mix(). Perhaps we should just expose a hash12() that takes three integers and calls mix() on them like hash_any does. The reason I'm thinking that is that we'll want to do the same thing for bigint, float4, float8, etc. And that fix you committed a while back to improve the catcache hash function made a huge difference. Now I'm wondering if it shouldn't just be invoking hash_any() or mix() too. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
