Gregory Stark wrote: > > "Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Log Message: > > ----------- > > Avoid losing track of data for shared tables in pgstats. Report by Michael > > Fuhr, patch from Tom Lane after a messier suggestion by me. > > When does this bug date to?
It was in 8.1. I didn't verify whether it affects on 8.0; I think we separated the shared tables in pgstats in 8.1, with the advent of autovacuum, so I assume it doesn't. The patch doesn't apply cleanly to 8.0 anyway, and I decided not to spent much time on it seeing that nobody has noticed it in years. > is it possible it's related to the performance drop immediately > following a vacuum analyze we've been seeing? I don't think so, unless you were counting on pgstats data of shared tables for something. The optimizer, for one, doesn't, so I doubt it would affect query planning. And it would only affect you if your queries were using shared tables, which I very much doubt ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
