On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 01:31:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Why is that better than the initdb-time option we already have? > Locking down options earlier rather than later is usually not a win.
Like I said, I don't actually think it _is_ better. But it would solve the problem that some people think it's a bad thing that you run superuser-type commands without reading the manual, and then get a badly-secured system. (The idea here, incidentally, is not to replace the initdb-time option, but to set the default of the initdb command.) A -- Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir? --attr. John Maynard Keynes ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings