On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Gregory Stark wrote: > >> Could I suggest renaming log_autovacuum to log_autovacuum_min_duration? > > > Sure, whatever makes the most sense. In fact min_duration would be more > > consistent. > > I'm not sure I believe Greg's argument about needing more autovac > logging parameters, but since this one acts just like > log_min_duration_statement, I concur with renaming it.
log_min_duration_autovacuum makes the most sense in comparison, IMHO. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
