Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I couldn't reproduce it in a few tries. A reasonable guess is that >> it's triggered by autovacuum deciding to vacuum the table sometime >> before the VACUUM FULL starts. Anyone want to try to reproduce it?
> Hum, aren't vacuums supposed to be blocked by each other? Sure. I'm not thinking it's a case of concurrent vacuums (if it is, we've got worse problems than anyone imagined), but rather that the autovac left the table in a state that exposes a bug in the subsequent VACUUM FULL. Since we've whacked the tqual.c logic around recently, the problem might actually lie there... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org