2007/8/12, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "Gregory Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>> We're seeing a problem where occasionally a process appears to be
> >>>> granted a
> >>>> lock but miss its semaphore signal.
> >>>
> >>> Kernel bug maybe? What's the platform?
>
> I've written a synthetic test program to check for lost semaphore wakeups. I
> can't seem to produce any on my machine but haven't had a chance to run it yet
> on the benchmark machine that's been showing the problem.
>
> If I can't produce any lost wakeups with a program like this it looks more
> like it might be a Postgres or GCC bug than a Linux bug.
>
> It would be helpful if people could run this on various architectures and
> various versions of Linux (or other OSes). I've been running it with 40
> processes for an hour, but even shorter runs would be useful. It will drive
> the load on your machine through the roof but doesn't cause any i/o.
>
> $ gcc -Wall ipctest.c -lrt
> $ ./a.out 40 3600
>
>
> --
> Gregory Stark
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
>
Hello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/osrelease
2.6.22.1-41.fc7
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ ./a.out 40 3600
running with 40 processes for 3600s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$
without any problem
Regards
Pavel Stehule
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
