Bruce Momjian wrote: > Is enlarging the xid field something we should consider for 8.4? Is the > autovacuum I/O less then the extra I/O needed for an expanded xid fields > on every row?
I doubt that's going to happen... Maybe we can do something to reduce the xid consumption? For example, reuse xids for read-only queries. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
