2007/9/4, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Ben Tilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 9/3/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There seems fairly clear use-case for allowing A-Z a-z 0-9 and > >> underscore (while CVS head rejects 0-9 and underscore). > > > The problem with allowing uppercase letters is that on some > > filesystems foo and Foo are the same file, and on others they are not. > > This may lead to obscure portability problems where code worked fine > > on Unix and then fails when the database is running on Windows. > > Yeah, good point. So far it seems that a-z 0-9 and underscore cover the > real use-cases, so what say we just allow those for now? It's a lot > easier to loosen up later than tighten up ... > > regards, tom lane >
It's system specific. I prefere a-z and A-Z. Clasic name for dictionaries combine lower and upper characters .. for czech cs_CZ_UTF8 etc. dictfile = cs_CZ_UTF8 ... automatic convert to cs_cz_utf8.dict dictfile = 'cs_CZ_UTF8' .. check and use cs_CZ_UTF8 Regards Pavel Stehule p.s. it's important on UNIX platforms and without any efect on windows. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
