Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2007 00:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, on re-reading that, it seems a tad surprising to get an error right
>> there --- if postgres_fe.h or anything it includes were broken, then the
>> build should have failed earlier. Is the failure reproducible in
>> repeated tries?
> Yes. Just for giggles I played with the configure flags as well, but it
> always errors in that spot.
Hmph. I checked the CVS logs and there haven't been any recent changes
that seem like they could be related.
It might be worth getting gcc -E output and looking to see what that
part of netdb.h looks like after macro expansion.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
