On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Decibel! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
3 isn't that important to me, but 4 is:
4. Doesn't hammer the database to measure
And pgstattuple fails #4 miserably. Want to know the average dead
space
in a 500GB database? Yeah, right....
So we could put a vacuum_cost_delay() in it ...
pg_stat_delay()? ;)
That's better than what we have now, without a doubt. But I'd still
prefer to have a table I can just read on the fly.
We do have a TODO to replace the current stats infrastructure with
something that has less overhead, right? :)
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
