Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2007-25-09 at 22:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Personally I won't cry if this doesn't make it into 8.3, particularly >> since there was some disagreement about it. But if you intend to make >> it happen, the days grow short.
> My recollection is that the patch was okay as far as it went, but I'm > hesitant to add yet another alternative to the already complex set of > choices for returning composite types and sets from functions. If we > just make TABLE() syntax sugar for the existing OUT function stuff we > would avoid at least some of that complexity, but Pavel still prefers a > distinct proargmode, last I heard. OK, let's just hold this item for 8.4 then. It's way past time to get 8.3 out the door ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend