On 9/26/07, Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Wong wrote: > > On 9/25/07, Satoshi Nagayasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Mark, > >> > >> Very interesting. I'm looking for such tool. > >> > >> Unfortunately, I can't compile it on my Solaris right now, > >> but I hope it will be shipped with PostgreSQL distribution. > > > > I haven't tried it on Solaris but I'm not surprised. If I can get my > > hands on a Solaris system I can probably get it to work. :) The code > > for getting the process information is platform specific and I know > > I've broken it for all the platforms I haven't tried it on... > > Mark, > > I tested it on Solaris and I found two problems there. One is with > configure. It does not correctly handled CPPFLAGS. Generated makefile > ignore path to the include files. This line is wrong: > > # explicit dependency for the module appropriate to this machine > m_sunos5.o: $(srcdir)/machine/m_sunos5.c > $(COMPILE) -o $@ -c $(srcdir)/machine/m_sunos5.c > > Second issue is with new interface of get_process_info function. > Currently it has 4 arguments but in m_sunos5.c is defined only with 3 > arguments. > > Last issue is with -m64 switch. Solaris pg installation does not have > 64bit libpg (will be soon) and linker is not able put everything together.
Hi Zdenek, I don't have a Solaris system to work on. Would you be able to send a patch? I have a mercurial repository, info here: http://ptop.projects.postgresql.org/ I think I've already caught the CPPFLAGS problem too. Regards, Mark ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
