Tom Lane wrote: > Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Now that PostgreSQL 8.3 enables autovacuum by default, I think pgbench > > should stop issuing vacuum in pgbench -i since an ordinary vacuum will > > take very long time under autovacuum running. If there's no objection, > > I will remove vacuum from pgbench. > > I'd be inclined to leave it there, simply because you'll be changing > the conditions of the benchmark if you take it out. I have not noticed > any particular problems with it...
I wonder if autovacuum itself is going to add more variability to the test (like we don't have enough already). -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
