Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Tom Lane wrote: >>> >>>> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> >>>>> I don't see how timing has anything to do with this. You could have >>>>> added it between beta1 and beta2 after sufficient hackers discussion. >>>>> >>>> Uh, it *was* after beta1. >>>> >>> Oh, so it didn't hold up beta1 --- that's good. >>> >>> >> No it's not. >> >> Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new >> stuff after it has been declared? > > We allow /contrib to be more lax about beta changes.
the postgresql ecosystem is growing and there is a lot of people like packagers that will be a quite irritated if we keep randomly adding completely new code and modules during BETA. Stefan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
