Marko Kreen wrote: > On 10/11/07, Alexey Klyukin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hannu Krosing wrote: > > > For what use cases do you think your WAL-based approach is better than > > > Slony/Skytools trigger-based one ? > > > > A pure trigger based approach can only replicate data for the commands > > which fire triggers. AFAIK Slony is unable to replicate TRUNCATE > > command (I don't know if Skytools can). Replicator doesn't have this > > limitation. > > No, Skytools is same as Slony. > > Can you also replicate changes to system tables?
No, we need a table to have primary key to be able to replicate it. From the other hand replicating a system relation can be dangerous, i.e. what if you replicate the contents of pg_class without corresponing relations on the slave, that's why explicitly forbid enabling replication for relations from pg_catalog namespace. Regards, -- Alexey Klyukin http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
