On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:45:14 -0400 Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > We develop and commit like normal *until* the community feels there > > is enough for release. Then we announce a feature freeze. > > > > > > No, I think this is hopeless on several grounds. First, it increases > uncertainty. People need to be able to work towards a target. Second, > there will always be a temptation to "just squeeze in killer feature > X". Well that flows into that checkpoint idea I think. > > I think there is some virtue in Simon's suggestion, provided that > adequate reviewer resources are available. That might mean you need > to put on your fundraising hat and raise some reviewer sponsorship > money. Did someone say money? ;) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > cheers > > andrew > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature