Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe this was done a while ago. (It looks like it was patched on
> Aug 17 by a patch from Rene).
Looking again, getTables() seems to be fixed, but there is still an
unpatched reference to pg_description in getColumns(), in both
jdbc1 and jdbc2.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update needed f... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update nee... Jeroen van Vianen
- Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update nee... Tom Lane
- Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update nee... Barry Lind
- Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update nee... Rene Pijlman
- Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update nee... Rene Pijlman
- Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update... Bruce Momjian
