Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have never seen YY/MM/DD, only YYYY-MM-DD.
You have apparently forgotten what was standard practice just a few
years ago.
> The huge problem is
> deciding out how to decode 03-02-01. I think we have to require the
> century for those.
No, the entire point is to drive it off datestyle, *not* off the input
value ranges.
> If that is the only issue, I can ask on general, but I doubt someone is
> going to pipe up.
I really dislike the idea that we are going to legislate this behavior
in a three-person discussion on -patches. The people who will be
screaming about it don't read -patches.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
